The Best Salesperson Is Not Automatically Your Best Sales Manager
There is a promotion decision that looks obvious on paper.
Your top salesperson is consistently ahead of target. Customers like them. They know the market. They understand the product. A management role opens up.
Who better to lead the team?
Sometimes, almost anyone.
I say that as someone who has spent a large part of his career in sales and commercial leadership.
The skills overlap, but they are not the same job.
Great sellers have strong instincts
The best salespeople often do things almost automatically.
They know when to push. They hear uncertainty in a customer’s voice. They recognise when a deal is real. They know how to frame an argument without needing to write down the steps.
That instinct is enormously valuable when they are selling.
It can become a problem when they start managing.
A struggling salesperson asks for help and the new manager says, “I’d just call the customer and say…”
That is not coaching. That is describing how they would sell the deal.
Management requires patience
A sales manager wins through other people.
That means allowing someone to approach a problem differently from you. It means asking questions when you already think you know the answer. It means spending time with the person who is at 70% of target rather than personally rescuing the biggest deal.
For a high-performing seller, that transition can be deeply uncomfortable.
They have spent years being rewarded for individual output. Suddenly their success depends on creating output through others.
Do not use management as the only career path
Part of the problem is structural.
Many companies send a message that the only way for a strong salesperson to progress is to become a manager.
So people accept management roles for the title, money or status rather than because they actually want to lead.
Then the business loses an excellent salesperson and gains a reluctant manager.
That is not much of a promotion strategy.
Strong individual-contributor career paths matter.
Look for different evidence
When I am thinking about potential sales leaders, I look beyond personal performance.
Do other people naturally ask them for help? Can they explain why something works? Do they raise the performance of people around them? Are they comfortable having difficult conversations? Can they be consistent rather than heroic? Are they interested in the whole team’s number?
Those are better indicators of management potential than being number one on the leaderboard.
Selling gives you credibility. Leadership requires something else.
I absolutely want sales leaders who understand what it feels like to carry a number.
That experience matters.
But the job changes.
The question is no longer, “Can you win?”
It becomes, “Can you create an environment where other people consistently win?”
That is a very different test.

Comments