top of page

Why a Smaller Pipeline Can Be Better News

11 minutes ago
2 min read

Imagine telling a board that the commercial pipeline has fallen by 40% and expecting them to be pleased.

It sounds ridiculous.

Yet I have seen exactly that situation turn out to be one of the healthiest moments in a commercial turnaround.

The pipeline had not really fallen. The fiction had.

Big numbers feel safe

When a business is under pressure for growth, a large pipeline is comforting. It creates the sense that the revenue is out there somewhere and the job is simply to convert it.

That assumption drives all sorts of decisions.

We hire ahead of demand. We increase delivery capacity. We reassure investors. We tell ourselves the issue is timing rather than demand. We push the sales team to “close harder”.

But if the pipeline contains duplicated opportunities, dormant deals, unfunded ideas, vague expressions of interest and projects with no decision date, the coverage ratio is not protecting you. It is hiding the problem.

Cleaning a pipeline can feel like failure

The first proper pipeline clean-up is rarely a fun meeting.

People have spent months building those opportunities. Nobody wants to delete something that might come back. Sellers worry that their personal numbers will suddenly look weak. Managers worry about what the board will say.

So stale opportunities survive.

My view is simple: an opportunity can always come back into the pipeline when the customer gives you a reason to put it there.

Until then, it does not deserve to distort your view of the business.

Good news is knowing where you actually stand

Suppose you believe you have £30m of pipeline against a £10m target. On the surface, you have a conversion problem.

Then you qualify it properly and discover only £12m is active, funded and genuinely progressing.

That can feel alarming, but the diagnosis has changed completely.

You may not have a conversion problem at all. You may have a pipeline creation problem.

That difference matters.

The remedies are completely different. One needs better opportunity management. The other needs proposition work, market focus, demand generation, partnerships or more selling capacity.

You cannot fix the right problem while protecting the wrong number.

I would rather know early

One of the most expensive habits in business is postponing bad news.

A weak pipeline identified nine months before year-end gives you options. A weak pipeline discovered six weeks before year-end gives you explanations.

That is why I never see pipeline hygiene as an administrative exercise. It is a strategic one.

You are trying to expose reality early enough to change it.

The test I use

For every opportunity, I want to know three things:

If the answers are vague, the deal may still be worth nurturing, but it should not be carrying the same weight as a properly qualified opportunity.

Sometimes the most positive commercial meeting of the quarter is the one where the pipeline gets smaller.

Because once the comforting number disappears, the business can finally start solving the real problem.

Comments


bottom of page